Thinking About Silicone Breast Implants? Your Questions Answered (Safely & Naturally)
If you’re considering silicone breast augmentation, you’re likely asking: “Are silicone implants safe? Will they look natural? What’s the best option for me?” For decades, silicone-filled implants have sparked debate—but modern science and innovation have transformed them into one of the most trusted choices for women seeking natural-feeling, aesthetically harmonious results. FDA-approved since 2006 after rigorous study, today’s silicone gel implants are cohesive, durable, and designed to mimic natural breast tissue. “The fear surrounding silicone stems from outdated concerns,” explains Dr. Rajaie Hazboun, a plastic surgeon specializing in breast augmentation at Maas Clinic. “We now have decades of data showing their safety. The key lies in choosing an experienced surgeon and understanding your options—implant type, placement, and how they align with your body.”
Why Silicone? The Evolution of a Medical Marvel
Silicone implants have traveled a rocky road. In the 1990s, reports of leaking implants led to restricted use—until multiple scientific studies debunked links to systemic health issues. “The silicone used today isn’t the liquid of the past,” clarifies Dr. Hazboun. “It’s a cohesive gel that holds its shape, even if the shell ruptures.”
What makes silicone a top choice?
- Natural Feel: The gel mimics fatty tissue better than saline.
- Shape Retention: Less rippling, ideal for women with thinner breast tissue.
- Durability: Modern shells are engineered to resist wear.
Silicone vs. Saline: A Quick Comparison
| Feature | Silicone Implants | Saline Implants |
|---|---|---|
| Feel | Soft, natural | Firmer, water-like |
| Rippling Risk | Low | Higher (if tissue is thin) |
| FDA Approval | 2006+ (current generation) | 2000+ |
| Incision Size | Slightly larger | Smaller |
Placement: Subglandular vs. Submuscular
Where the implant sits—behind the breast tissue (subglandular) or under the chest muscle (submuscular)—impacts aesthetics and recovery.
Subglandular Placement
- Pros: Shorter recovery, more pronounced upper pole fullness.
- Cons: Higher visibility of rippling in thin patients.
Submuscular Placement
- Pros: Natural slope, added tissue coverage.
- Cons: Longer recovery, possible animation deformity.
“There’s no universal ‘best’,” says Dr. Hazboun. “I tailor placement to a patient’s anatomy, lifestyle, and goals.”
Safety First: What the Data Says
- 2012 FDA Review: Confirmed silicone implants’ safety profile, with routine MRI monitoring recommended.
- Low Complication Rates: Capsular contracture (<10%) and rupture (<1% annually) are rare with skilled placement.
- Cohesive Gel: Even if ruptured, gel typically stays within the scar tissue capsule.
Choosing Your Surgeon: The Maas Clinic Difference
“Silicone augmentation isn’t just about inserting an implant,” stresses Dr. Hazboun. “It’s an art—balancing proportions, selecting the right profile, and ensuring symmetry.” At Maas Clinic, patients receive:
- Custom Sizing: Try implants in-office.
- Transparent Consultations: Discuss risks, alternatives, and long-term care.
FAQs: Quick Answers from Dr. Hazboun
- Q: How long do silicone implants last?
A: 10-20 years—monitor with regular checkups. - Q: Can I breastfeed after augmentation?
A: Yes, if glands remain intact.
Final Thoughts
Silicone breast augmentation merges science with artistry. “My goal is to create results that feel like you—just enhanced,” says Dr. Hazboun. Whether you’re restoring volume post-pregnancy or seeking confidence, the path begins with education and a surgeon who prioritizes your vision.
Ready to explore your options? Schedule a consultation at Maas Clinic—where innovation meets individualized care in San Francisco.
